Wednesday, September 10, 2008

Is India really a Investment friendly country ?

In 1991-92 India opened it markets for Foreign Investors, though it was by pressure, but they opened it. After 1991-92 Indian economy grows stupendously, suprising normal hindu growth rate of 4-5% to growth rate of 9-10% in last financial quarter. But the question is even though Indian economy is posing such a sound growth rate, but really Indian shores are that investment friendly as they pose to be. There are multiple reason both in past and present which really clarifies this fact. First example was Posco, a south korean, steel giant proposal of 10billion$ investment in state of Orissa. The proposal is still hanging without any decision by the govt.
Second example is Tata's Nano factory in Singur, the recurrent opposition by the Mamta banerjee party, is making Tata to move out of Singur, which also cause a delay in their pet Nano project.
By looking at these two instances, the Indian shores are not as friendly as it seems. So if Indian economy really want to continue with its current growth rate, then its govt. hast to take really investment friendly decision, though these decisions may to be in favor for some people, but in the end it will be good for overall community, and also improves India's image as global investment destination.

Thanks&Regards,
Mohit



Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

Is Indian Realty Market also into Subprime ?




Just alike US housing market, Indian Realty market went through it highs starting 2003. In a span of two years, house prices in some of the metropolitan areas in India were doubled or tripled. But since the january sensex fall, Indian Realty sector was also in setback, be with the realty stocks or the housing prices. So can we say that Indian Realty boom was also a housing bubble and some traits of subprime lending is also in there. The question is little bit debatable, but as per my point of view Indian real estate market is far from Subprime, though there were speculation in the market but still I believe that its not in Subprime lending.

Here are some observations to support my point. But before I move with my observation, some facts about Subprime Crisis.

By Definition, Subprime lending generally refers to lending offered to those people who don't have required credit score.

Subprime Mortgage crisis did not only involves lending to risky customers, but it also involved beautification of these mortgages in tranches, which were afterwards sold to investors. This beautification techinque is known as securitization.

Securitization is a structured finance process where different assets are pooled together and offered as collateral to third party investments. The most common kind of securitzation assets are MBS(Mortgage Backed Securites) and CDO(Collateral Debt Obligations).

One more reason of Subprime Crisis is that most of the subprime loans were attached with adjustable rate mortgages (ARM). The most common type of ARM in US mortgage industry is 2/28 and 3/27. Most of the ARM comes with either very low initial rate, also known as teaser, or with no rate at all for first few years. But after some time, the teaser rates will be reset to be more realistic rates. With ARM most of the mortgage borrowers fall into lenders net, and borrowed loans which they never ever thought of.

Now, I will answer why the Indian Realty Market is not into Subprime.

1. First of most of the lending in India is done to prime lenders, I will not say there are no subprime lending , but the percentage of lending for houses are done to prime borrowers, with good credit history.

2. No concept of teaser rates, though interest rates may differ from lender to lender, but all rates are governed by the rates defined by central bank .

3. There is nothing call as Securitzation exist in Indian Financial Market, though recently RBI have announced Securitzation of govt. bonds, but the concept is still in its nascent stage.

4. Even in 2003, when Indian housing boom started, the lending interest rate were somewhere around 7-9%, even difficult for a prime borrowers to borrow the money beyond its capacity.

5. One more reason of Subprime crisis and lower interest was that, US govt want to revive there economy after the Dotcom bubble, so they reduced the market interest rates from 6.5% to 1%, which caused a spurt of borrowing amoung americans, while in India no such action was ever taken by any of the govt. in 61 years of Independence. Indian economy growth was more due to external factors like, more open market, infusion of investment both from Private and Institutional investors, raising of FDI in some of the key verticals.

So based on my observation, Indian realty was at its boon time, but it never in domestic subprime crisis.

Thanks&Regards,
Mohit





Reblog this post [with Zemanta]

Thursday, August 7, 2008

Carbon Trading

Recently while strolling through the pages of Economic Times, popularly known as ET, I cam across an article, with heading "China still ahead of India in Carbon trading". Carbon Trading, the term seems to be obnoxious, but it really struck me and I googled the web to get the exact meaning of Carbon trading. In trading community Carbon Trading is also known as Emission trading. So according to CarbonTrading.com, Carbon Trading can be defined as "is a market based mechanism for helping mitigate the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere. Carbon tradingmarkets are developing that bring buyers and sellers of carbon credits together with standardized rules of trade.". So a big power generator company can become a buyer of Carbon Credits, while an agricultural farm owner may become a seller of Carbon Credit. So if a power company has to increase its capacity beyond the defined band, then they have to buy the Carbon Credit from the less polluter or less Co2 emitter seller, thus forming a tradable environment. I hope this platform may provide both development with environment control at the same hand.






Thanks&Regards,
Mohit Kumar
Zemanta Pixie

Saturday, August 2, 2008

Artist Funds

Art business as Investment funds are in the market for quite some time, creating value addition for the sellers and the buyers of the art. But just like, Art Funds, on the similar lines can we think of an Artist funds, and start trading them on bourses as a trading commodites. Not necessarily an Artist be from a field of art, but he can be any human being from Films, Sports, Business, VC etc. Now if this Artist Funds exist, the next question is how this funds will have a value. As per my opinion, every Artist successful in its field has a brand image, this brand image brings him more work/business, more number of audiences etc.. Now as more work, audience, earning potential means more market or trading value of that Artist. I don't know how much this concept be viable based on the guidelines given by Capital markets regulators, but it certainly can be viable oppurtunity, to which one can give a serious thinking.

Thanks&Regards,
Mohit Kumar

Thursday, July 17, 2008

VAS : The next big thing in Mobile Telecom


With the advent of Mobile technology,the communication barrier between the people is completely broken. Now ever days mobile tele density is increasing day by day, just for instance India largest GSM player Bharti , alone adds 20-30 million customers in a month. Bharti is not alone who is getting the customer in big numbers, its every major telecom operator, who is counting on such a big customer number. Though in India, the tele density base is still lowest as compare to other developed nation. But this question must hovering in a mind of every CEO of a telecom company, and the question is What after Mobile Telephony reach its saturation ? The first obvious answer is looking for opportunities in another emerging markets, through ways of merger and acquisitions. But M&A is not a cakewalk for every organization. The second answer is providing Value added service (VAS), to end user. Today, mobile is not only a calling device, but it's a more or less like a computer in the hands of the customer. They use their mobile for ringtones,gaming, chatting, watching news, cricket scores, stock quotes etc.. As the mobile bandwidth increase, the demand for such kind of products will definitely be increased, so during that time, every other telecom operator will not only trying for new customers, but they will also try to retain their existing customers, by offering best of the best VAS services, either free of cost or at a negligible amount. So as per my opinion, the VAS will be the next big thing in Mobile telecom business.

Thanks&Regards,
Mohit Kumar

Zemanta Pixie

Monday, July 14, 2008

Dark Pool Riding on Bourses

Today, when I was reading TOI, I came across an article which was really quite fascinating to read. The article was on Dark Pool kind of trading activities, which is getting huge momentum in US and Europe bourses. According to Times, its one of the biggest structural in equity trading to hit the American and European in 20 years, and it is threatening the real existence of exchanges like LSE NYSE and Euronext.

By Investopedia, dark pool gets its name because details of these trades are concealed from the public.

So Dark pooling is not for small investors, this kind of trading is suitable for institutional investors having lump sum amount of money to park in such kind of activity.

As this kind of trading involves huge amount of money, and directly or indirectly it will affect stocks valuations. So regulators providing such platform to these institutional investors, have to keep a hawk eye on them in order to prevent some big fraud or crisis like sub-prime, and also to safegaurd interests of small investors.

Thanks&Regards,
Mohit Kumar
Zemanta Pixie

Wednesday, July 9, 2008

MTN / R-COM tie up in jittery

After Bharti Airtel broke merger talks with MTN, R-COM without any delay entered with a 45 day exclusivity merger talk with MTN, with a hope to create one of the biggest telecom conglomerate in emerging markets. For intial couple of weeks things seemed to be going smoothly, keeping in mind the scale of the deal and business policies of the two nations, a different deal scenarios were created, from share swaping to R-COM becoming a subsidiary of MTN. But as markets were expecting the deal to work through smoothly, there was a full stop from RIL. The RIL issued a statement saying that in R-COM and MTN deal, they have a Right of First Refusal (RoFR ). This statement from RIL, put the complete deal in jittery, which in turn led to increase in the exclusivity talk time period. Hope to see the animosity between Ambani brothers to be settled off peacefully, so that R-COM and MTN deal end up successfully.

Thanks&Regards,
Mohit Kumar


Zemanta Pixie